Here is something most senior professionals learn too late: by the time a company decides you are leaving, it has usually been working on the file for months. Legal has been consulted. The narrative has been drafted. The severance number was calculated against what the company thinks you will accept quietly.
Mizrahi Kroub LLP is a Manhattan employment firm, and our executive employment lawyers in NYC represent senior professionals, partners, and C-suite plaintiffs in disputes with large employers. We handle the discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and separation matters where the compensation at stake is measured in equity and deferred pay, not just salary.
If you are being managed out, already out, or holding an agreement someone wants signed by Friday, get it reviewed before you respond. Consultations are free. Call +1 (212) 970-8437.
If your exit involves equity, a bonus cycle, a restrictive covenant, or a story about your performance that does not match four years of reviews, then yes, before you negotiate rather than after. Senior-level claims turn on documents most employees never sign, and the leverage window is usually short.
The people we work with tend to be:
What they have in common is that a standard employment claim understates what they lost. This page exists because that gap needs its own conversation. For general workplace claims, our full-service New York employment law practice is the better starting point.
Usually far more than the severance offer suggests. At senior levels, base salary is often the smallest part of the loss, and the instruments that carry real value are the ones governed by plan documents rather than by your offer letter.
We work through all of it before anyone responds to an offer. Sometimes the strongest claim is not the discrimination claim at all. It is the contract claim sitting underneath it, and the discrimination facts are what make the contract claim worth resolving.
Have a separation agreement in front of you? Call +1 (212) 970-8437 before the deadline on it passes.
Bring six things and we can usually tell you where you stand in one conversation.
This sets the terms everyone will argue about: cause definitions, notice, good reason resignation rights, and whether you agreed to arbitration.
Not the summary. The plan itself, plus each grant agreement. This is where "for cause" quietly becomes a seven-figure question.
If you hold an interest rather than a title, your claim may live in contract and fiduciary duty law rather than employment law alone.
The strongest evidence in senior cases is almost always the company's own record of how it valued you until the moment it decided not to.
Review periods, revocation rights, and what the release actually covers. Some rights cannot be waived, no matter what the paper says.
Calendar entries, texts, the meeting that was moved, the person suddenly added to a distribution list. Timing is the argument.
The same statutes that protect every New York worker protect senior professionals, and New York City and State law reach further than federal law does. What changes at this level is the evidence, the damages, and the discretion required.
Age, gender, race, national origin, religion, and pregnancy claims look different in the executive suite. There is rarely a slur. There is a succession plan, a "culture fit" conversation, a client relationship reassigned, a role restructured for a candidate fifteen years younger. Circumstantial cases built from comp data, promotion patterns, and board-level decisions are their own discipline.
Senior professionals are the people most likely to see something and most exposed when they report it. Public company employees who report suspected securities or shareholder fraud have protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The OSHA whistleblower program requires those complaints to be filed within 180 days, with remedies including reinstatement, back pay with interest, special damages, and attorney's fees. That deadline is short, and it does not wait for your severance negotiation to conclude.
Power dynamics change the analysis when the person involved sits on the executive committee or controls your compensation. We handle executive-level sexual harassment claims, including matters where internal reporting channels run through people with a direct stake in the outcome.
Not every matter should become a lawsuit, and at this level most do not. A well-supported demand backed by documents frequently produces a better result than filing, faster and with less exposure.
Being fired shortly before a vesting date or a bonus payout is not automatically unlawful, but it is frequently the thread worth pulling. Our deep dive on wrongful termination issues unique to high-net-worth executives covers how these cases get built.
Not necessarily, and for harassment claims, often not at all. Under the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, signed March 3, 2022, no pre-dispute arbitration agreement is valid or enforceable against a person bringing a case that relates to a sexual assault or sexual harassment dispute. The choice belongs to the employee, not the employer.
The Act reaches claims that arose on or after that date, so when the conduct happened matters as much as when you signed the agreement.
Outside that category, arbitration clauses generally hold. But "generally" carries a lot of weight in executive agreements, where clauses are frequently drafted inconsistently across the offer letter, the equity plan, and the handbook. Which document governs which claim is a real question, and the answer sometimes splits a case across two forums in a way that improves your position.
Arbitration is also not automatically bad for a senior claimant. It is private, which some clients want more than they want a courtroom. The decision should be strategic rather than accepted by default.
Quietly, and usually before anything gets filed. Most of our matters resolve pre-litigation, which keeps the dispute out of public dockets and out of the industry conversation. For senior professionals in a small market, that is often the deciding factor.
Confidentiality also runs both directions now. Federal and New York law have both narrowed what employers can demand in a settlement. Non-disclosure terms in New York cannot be imposed unilaterally in discrimination and harassment settlements, the choice has to be yours, and you are entitled to time to consider and to revoke. Employers still ask for silence as a default. It is negotiable more often than the first draft implies.
Practical points we raise early with senior clients:
Keep the dispute off company systems. Assume anything on a work device is visible.
Be careful with your network. Sympathetic colleagues become witnesses, and witnesses talk to the company.
Decide what you want the outcome to look like. A number, a reference, a corrected record, a release from a non-compete, or all four. That target shapes every move.
They often decide whether you can afford to walk away at all. A non-compete that sidelines you for twelve months in the only market where your experience is worth anything is a real financial loss, and it belongs in the negotiation alongside severance and equity.
New York courts do not treat these clauses as automatically enforceable. They look at whether the restriction is reasonable in time and geography, whether it protects a legitimate business interest such as trade secrets or genuinely unique services, and whether it imposes undue hardship on you or harms the public. Broad covenants drafted to cover an entire industry frequently do not survive that review intact.
Garden leave changes the picture again. Being paid to sit out is a different proposition than being restricted for free, and where an employer wants continued restriction, continued pay is a legitimate ask.
Non-solicitation terms deserve separate attention. Clients who followed you for a decade, a team you personally recruited, and a contact list you built are treated differently under New York law depending on how the agreement is written and how the relationship actually developed.
The practical move is to negotiate a release or a narrowing of these terms during the exit, when the company still wants something from you. Once you have signed and gone, your leverage is largely spent.
Not by your base salary, which is where employers usually start and where senior claimants lose ground. A proper calculation looks at total compensation over a realistic period: base, historical bonus, the value of equity that would have vested, deferred amounts, benefits, and retirement contributions.
One feature of New York law changes the economics here. Both the State and City Human Rights Laws allow a prevailing employee to recover attorney's fees, which means an employer weighing a lowball offer is also weighing what your legal costs will look like two years from now.
There is a duty to mitigate, meaning you are expected to look for comparable work. At senior levels this cuts in the claimant's favor more often than employers expect. When there are eleven jobs in the country at your level and three are at competitors you are contractually barred from joining, an extended search is evidence of the harm, not a weakness in your case.
Keep a record of every application, recruiter conversation, and rejection. It becomes part of the damages proof.
We represent employees, not companies, and a meaningful share of our work is against large employers with in-house legal departments and outside firms on retainer. That is the matchup we prepare for.
Compassionate with you, forceful with them. Those are not opposite settings. The person across the table gets a firm that came prepared. You get one that answers the phone.
A dedicated client relations contact. Senior clients tend to be running a job search, a family, and a legal matter at once. You should not have to chase your own case for an update.
Most matters resolve before litigation. Joseph Mizrahi and Edward Kroub lead a team carrying more than $1 billion in settlement experience, and in senior matters discretion and preparation move numbers earlier than motion practice does.
We are not the volume shop. We take fewer, more considered matters, which is why the strategy conversation happens with attorneys rather than with an intake script.
Case results depend entirely on the specific facts and law involved, and prior outcomes do not predict what will happen in any other matter.
Start with how the agreement characterizes your departure, because that label usually controls whether unvested grants survive or are forfeited under the equity plan. Then check whether the release reaches contract claims tied to the plan documents, and whether the payment schedule lines up with your next vesting date. Those three points frequently move the number more than the severance formula does.
Sometimes it tries, and that attempt can itself be retaliation. Forfeiture usually depends on the plan's definition of cause and on how the termination is characterized. When a company re-labels a departure after an employee complains, the timing becomes evidence rather than housekeeping.
It depends on the forum and your industry. Arbitrations and pre-litigation settlements generally stay private, while court filings are public. In regulated fields, how an exit is reported to a regulator can matter more than the lawsuit itself, which is why we address the reporting language during negotiation rather than afterward.
Possibly. Courts look at the substance of the relationship rather than the title on the door, weighing factors like who controls your work, whether you share in profits and losses, and how much real authority you hold. Many people carrying a partner title are treated as employees under the law, and even where they are not, the partnership agreement often supplies a strong contract claim.
Pre-litigation resolutions frequently move within a few months, while litigated or arbitrated matters run considerably longer. The bigger variable is not the forum, it is how complete your documentation is at the start. Clients who bring their plan documents to the first meeting tend to reach a resolution sooner.
Senior careers are not rebuilt easily. The equity was the point, the title took years, and the industry you work in is smaller than it looks from outside. A rushed signature on a Friday afternoon can close all of that out for a fraction of its value.
Mizrahi Kroub LLP advises senior professionals across Manhattan and New York City on executive employment disputes, from a first read of a separation agreement through resolution. Bring us the paperwork and the timeline. We will tell you what we see, plainly, and what we would do about it.
Call +1 (212) 970-8437 for a confidential consultation at no cost, or email info@mizrahikroub.com.
Mizrahi Kroub LLP 225 Broadway, 39th Floor New York, NY 10007